I will give it a try, but we can not have all and everything in 120x80 pixels. I have a not quite complete, reverse-engineered svg monkey, feel free to reuse it.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jant...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm going to miss the monkey. Are you sure there's not any way to work it > in?? > > > Regards, > > Kirk Jantzer > http://about.me/kirkjantzer > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you all for the feedback! > > - stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good > > - apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to > completely > > rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays > a > > logo without the "apache". > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_CloudStack > > - etc: the "powered by" font type does not go well with the "cloudstack" > > > > I go back to my drawing board and see what I can do for v0.0.2 > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I like, > > > 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there. > > > I think it must even. > > > 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rberg...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com> > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > >> Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org > > > >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM > > > >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for > > CloudStack > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> Here is my version: > > > >> - SVG format as you requested > > > >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I > > prefer > > > few > > > >> colors for such pictures > > > >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs > > to > > > fit > > > >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail > (the > > > >> monkey is übercool anyway) > > > >> - if no monkey, then cloud > > > >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make > > > >> difficult to read in such a small place > > > >> - see attached file :) > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to > be > > > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so > cute.) > > > > > > > > Two things - > > > > > > > > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared > > > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, > > not > > > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my > > screen... :) > > > > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to > > > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it > > > shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)? > > > > > > > > -robyn > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi folks: > > > >> > > > > >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I > > > >> > have a great opportunity for you :) > > > >> > > > > >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and > is > > > >> > also attractive. > > > >> > > > > >> > A couple examples of powered by logos: > > > >> > > > > >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000 > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png > > > >> > > > > >> > A couple of constraints: > > > >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it > > > >> > will make life simpler) > > > >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us > > to > > > >> > scale/etc) > > > >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different > > that > > > >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement > > around > > > >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as > > that > > > >> > sentence makes it out to be.) > > > >> > > > > >> > Anyone interested? > > > >> > > > > >> > --David > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> EOF > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > EOF > > > -- EOF
<<attachment: monkey.svg>>
