Yes ,I have tested with latest from 4.2.1. Regards sadhu
-----Original Message----- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 31 December 2013 18:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC Suresh, did you test with latest from 4.2.1 or the 4.2.1 RC3 that's up for vote? --David On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Suresh Sadhu <suresh.sa...@citrix.com> wrote: > I have pulled latest code and tried on 4.2 branch and not able to reproduce > the issue (mine is nfs based primary storage).can you please provide more > details on your setup . > > > > Regards > Sadhu > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: 30 December 2013 02:26 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC > > -1 (binding) because of the snapshot issues pointed out by Nux, > (CLOUDSTACK-5393) > > --David > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Abhinandan Prateek > <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >> The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate the >> previous RC did not get pushed to repo. >> >> Following are the particulars to vote for this time around: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h >> = >> refs/heads/4.2 >> commit: 1b2b58fe352a19aee1721bd79b9d023d36e80ec5 >> >> List of changes are available in Release Notes, a summary can be accessed >> here: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain >> ; >> f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 >> >> Source release revision 3911 (checksums and signatures are available at the >> same location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using RSA Key ID = 42443AA1): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours (until 20 Dec 2013 End of day PST). >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>
