Yes, that's how i read it.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungard.com> wrote: > Daan, > > A little bit of clarification. > > Listed below is the paragraph I was referring in this > description<https://people.apache.org/~ke4qqq/docs2/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0/html/Admin_Guide/creating-network-offerings.html> > : > > > - Redundant router capability. (v3.0.3 and greater) Available only when > Virtual Router is selected as the Source NAT provider. Select this option > if you want to use two virtual routers in the network for uninterrupted > connection: one operating as the master virtual router and the other as the > backup. The master virtual router receives requests from and sends > responses to the user’s VM. The backup virtual router is activated only > when the master is down. After the failover, the backup becomes the master > virtual router. CloudStack deploys the routers on different hosts to ensure > reliability if one host is down. > > > > So the interpretation should be: > > Source Nat needs to be enabled to allow redundant virtual router to be > active and other functions which do not conflict with the Source Nat > function may be enabled as needed. > > Do I have it correct? > > Karl > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM > Subject: Re: rvr4vpc > To: Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungard.com> > Cc: Christopher Litsinger <christopher.litsi...@sungard.com> > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungard.com> > wrote: >> I found a reference here which seems to imply only Source Nat Routers can > be >> made redundant in >> guest networks. > > > I see, AFAIK you misinterpreted the text here; the option 'Source Nat' > needs to be active but i think other options may be active as well. > > > > > -- > Karl O. Harris > Cloud Software Engineer > Sungard Availability Services
