On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> [Animesh] I know but at this time we need closer scrutiny and just the
> specific change helps in that. There was a similar comment in private when
> some of us were reviewing security patches.
point taken
I am not cherry picking the serializable issues and the hiding
overidden fields issues.
also
- result.replaceAll("<br>", "/n");
+ result = result.replaceAll("<br>", "/n");
where result is returned without the replacement , because i think /n
should be \n anyway
I have removed excess formatting changes in only one case. I am going
to run a test compile and will the push
