No, its the same thing as the ticket describe. I tried to lunch a VM, and the resource limit was reached for my account even if there was no volume running at all.
FG On Jan 31, 2014 12:15 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Francois, > > Can you please explain what is the impact you are seeing in primary > storage count. Is it the negative value of primary storage count or > something else. > > --Sanjay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 5:23 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com > Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Sanjay Tripathi > Subject: RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406 > > Copying the folks that worked on it > > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: CLOUDSTACK-5406 > > Hi, > > I saw this bug as been fixed for the secondary storage limits in 4.3: > CLOUDSTACK-5406 > > But it seems to impact the primary storage limit count as well, at least > in 4.2.1. Is the primary storage count fixed in 4.3 (I can't test right > now) as well? > > Thanks! > > -- > Francois Gaudreault > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > fgaudrea...@cloudops.com > 514-629-6775 > - - - > CloudOps > 420 rue Guy > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 > www.cloudops.com > @CloudOps_ > >
