It should be on the wiki :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Current+Maintainers+Per+Component

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> I would start doing so right now, but I have never heard of a list of
> component maintainers and google didn't find one for me either. Ideally,
> such list should be here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html or
> it should be at least linked from this page.
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> LS,
>>
>> I would like to see contributers add reviewers to their submissions. I
>> noticed quite soe old review requests that don't have anyone's
>> attention. There are component 'owners' for everything and I have easy
>> speach as I am not listed as contact for any component but I wouldn't
>> mind being assinged and then calling in who I considder the expert on
>> a subject. It will prevent these long standing review requests in my
>> opinion.
>>
>> thoughts, counters, rants?
>>
>> Daan
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:38 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> > I have not. Yesterday RB went down for some period of time, though
>> > AFAIK, infra restored it.
>> >
>> > --David
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> H David,
>> >>
>> >> have you started on this yet?
>> >> I can't reach the review board at the moment.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:59 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> >>> Hi folks:
>> >>>
>> >>> ReviewBoard is pretty bloated. There are currently 93 reviews that are
>> open.
>> >>>
>> >>> Some of those haven't been updated in 7 months old.
>> >>>
>> >>> Unless someone objects (and promptly begins reviewing and applying
>> >>> patches) I will close any patch that hasn't been updated in 2 months.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please take a few minutes to go look through ReviewBoard and update
>> >>> things as appropriate.
>> >>>
>> >>> --David
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF

Reply via email to