I like the monkeyinside-0.0.3.1.svg and also steroid monkey[ in this it will be good if we reduce the fonsize for the text " poweredby"]
Regards Sadhu From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 February 2014 03:38 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok with the trademark) On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com<mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote: I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a very easy job :-) On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of our fellow primates) On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jant...@gmail.com<mailto:kirk.jant...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the > idea) > > > Regards, > > Kirk Jantzer > http://about.me/kirkjantzer > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland > <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>wrote: > >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud. >> >> sorry to nag, >> Daan >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak >> <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com<mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Sending version 0.0.3: >> > - Complete monkey added >> > - "Apache" added >> > - Clouds more like the original logo >> > This also comes with some cons: >> > - 4 colors >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1 >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, >> even >> > the monkey is so-so. >> > >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud. >> > >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg, >> spot >> > the difference :-) >> > >> > Your feedback is welcome! >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Laszlo >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland >> > <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I like, >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there. >> >> I think it must even. >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron >> >> <rberg...@redhat.com<mailto:rberg...@redhat.com>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" >> >> >> <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com<mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> >> Cc: >> >> >> market...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:market...@cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for >> CloudStack >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is my version: >> >> >> - SVG format as you requested >> >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I >> prefer >> >> >> few >> >> >> colors for such pictures >> >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs >> to >> >> >> fit >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the >> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway) >> >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud >> >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place >> >> >> - see attached file :) >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to >> be >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so >> cute.) >> >> > >> >> > Two things - >> >> > >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's >> intentional, not >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my >> screen... :) >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it >> shouldn't >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)? >> >> > >> >> > -robyn >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley >> >> >> <da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi folks: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and >> is >> >> >> > also attractive. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png >> >> >> > >> >> >> > A couple of constraints: >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it >> >> >> > will make life simpler) >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us >> to >> >> >> > scale/etc) >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement >> around >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Anyone interested? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > --David >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> EOF >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > EOF >> -- EOF -- EOF
