-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review34062
-----------------------------------------------------------


On high instance count cluster hosts (in clusters based on XS6.2) a max of 16 
would reduce the allowed instances on such a host. I would like to suggest, in 
addition to the current proposition, make dynamic scaling configurable on a 
compute offering. When DS has been disabled instances based on that service 
offering will get vCPUMAX=vCPU. The same goes for system offerings. If this 
suggestion is not desirable I would like to suggest to only implement for 
system offerings.

- Joris van Lieshout


On Feb. 7, 2014, 11:19 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 11:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Kishan Kavala, and Nitin 
> Mehta.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6023
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6023
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a 
> vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits
> 
> Changed the VCPU max limit to 16 and provided a cluster level configuration 
> parameter for this max limit named xen.vm.vcpu.max
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/VirtualMachineTO.java e6240ff 
>   plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/XenServerGuru.java 28bd724 
>   
> plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
>  48ccf70 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Harikrishna Patnala
> 
>

Reply via email to