> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 8:41 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
> >
> > I have a review request sitting at https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/
> > - that works for me but I don't know if it's breaking AWSAPI
> > functionality. Would love it if somebody more familiar with that
> > module could test. I'd rather not just check that in and see what happens.
> [Animesh] I agree we cannot checkin especially so late in release unless we
> are absolutely sure.
> >
> > Animesh, I know you put a ton of work into these RCs and I hate
> > holding you up,
> [Animesh] Well you are not holding me up. It's a community release not just
> mine :)
>
> but here's my train of thought: packaging/centos63/package.sh is broken
> > because one of the RPMs it attempts to build is for awsapi. No self-
> > respecting enterprise (I hope, dream) is going to drop non-packaged
> > (deb, rpm, whatever) code on production systems. So if that packaging
> > ability is broken, there's a good chance enterprises can't use the new code.
>
>
> [Animesh] John while you can reproduce the issue but
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/
> has been building successfully. Can we not use that? I guess this may have
> been an issue for prior releases too but has not blocked folks.
[Animesh] Folks given that Jenkins build is successful I will proceed with RC
>
> >
> > Just got an idea to see if Apache's Sonatype has a valid mirror, and
> > it does, at least for some[1]. So I'll go down that path this AM as
> > well, in case my patch above doesn't work.
> >
> > John
> > 1: https://repository.apache.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~mex
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok so how do we get past this? This should have been pre-existing as
> > dependency has been broken for a long time and I am not sure if this
> > should block our next RC.
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 4:14 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
> > >>
> > >> David was seeing this as well. This is is a documented problem at
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPART-393.
> > >>
> > >> I just spun up a VM at AWS using a 64 bit amazon linux api. Ran the
> > >> commands below, got same errors:
> > >>
> > >> 1 sudo yum update
> > >> 2 yum install git java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel
> > >> 3 git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
> > >> 4 wget http://www.dsgnwrld.com/am/maven/maven-
> > >> 3/3.2.1/binaries/apache-maven-3.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> > >> 5 tar xvf apache-maven-3.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> > >> 6 export PATH=$PATH:~/apache-maven-3.2.1/bin/
> > >> 7 cd cloudstack/
> > >> 8 mvn -P deps
> > >> 9 mvn clean install -Pawsapi
> > >>
> > >> I suspect the Citrix devs are sitting behind Nexus or other maven mirror?
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 6, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > >>
> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com<mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
> > >> >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Folks anyone else seeing this? I want to build RC soon and wanted
> > >> to confirm if this is an issue or not and if so if we can get a fix
> > >> right away
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:20 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
> > >>
> > >> John,
> > >>
> > >> I could not reproduce this broken build on 4.3 after wiping out my
> > >> entire repository.
> > >> 1. rm -rf ~/.m2/repository
> > >> 2. mvn clean install -Pawsapi
> > >>
> > >> My build is successful.
> > >>
> > >> Can someone who is able to reproduce this check this further?
> > >>
> > >> Prachi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [INFO]
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> ---
> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> > >> [INFO]
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack ................................. SUCCESS
> > >> [1:53.957s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent
> > >> ........ SUCCESS [0.089s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework -
> > >> Managed Context ..... SUCCESS [28.189s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack
> > >> Utils ........................... SUCCESS [1:06.368s] [INFO] Apache
> > >> CloudStack Framework ....................... SUCCESS [0.303s]
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS
> > >> [27.125s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration
> > >> ....... SUCCESS [5.878s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack API
> > >> .............................
> > >> SUCCESS [55.346s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST
> > >> ................ SUCCESS [16.891s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack
> > >> Framework
> > >> - IPC ................. SUCCESS [11.845s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack
> > >> Cloud Engine .................... SUCCESS [0.072s] [INFO] Apache
> > >> CloudStack Cloud Engine API ................ SUCCESS [10.641s]
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Core ............................ SUCCESS
> > >> [30.300s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents
> > >> .......................... SUCCESS [22.533s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack
> > >> Framework
> - Clustering ..........
> > >> SUCCESS [8.801s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs
> > >> ................ SUCCESS [9.251s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud
> > >> Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [39.764s] [INFO] Apache
> > >> CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.761s]
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API
> > >> SUCCESS [6.014s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Server
> > >> ..........................
> > >> SUCCESS [1:23.722s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server
> > >> .................... SUCCESS [9.872s] [INFO] Apache XenSource XAPI
> > >> ............................. SUCCESS [17.003s] [INFO] Apache
> > >> CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component SUCCESS [16.774s]
> > >>
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .................. SUCCESS
> > [0.100s] ...........
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Client UI ....................... SUCCESS
> > >> [35.094s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Console Proxy - RDP Client ......
> > >> SUCCESS [24.447s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Console Proxy
> > >> ................... SUCCESS [0.120s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack
> > >> Console Proxy - Server .......... SUCCESS [6.431s] [INFO] Apache
> > >> CloudStack Framework - QuickCloud .......... SUCCESS [0.577s]
> > >> [INFO] Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge .................. SUCCESS
> > >> [4:57.758s] [INFO] ----
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -
> > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> > >> [INFO]
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --
> > >> ---
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:51 AM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
> > >>
> > >> The dependency's actually been broken for a very long time,
> > >> apparently. On a clean box with no maven repository cache (rm -rf
> > >> ~/.m2/repository), awsapi (and therefore RPMs) will not build.
> > >>
> > >> It looks like Noa saw similar issue in
> > >> 42f3804fbdde7bfe4f3676ef0c18a54dfe95354c, but I'm still seeing issues.
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > >>
> > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com<mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com><
> > >> m ailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> John when was the dependency broken? Are you not able to build
> > AWSAPI?
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:00 AM
> > >> To:
> > >>
> >
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:de
> > >> v
> > >> @cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
> > >>
> > >> FYI I'm still -1 until CLOUDSTACK-6156 and
> > >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/ is addressed.
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > >>
> > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com<mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com><
> > >> m ailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:58 AM
> > >> To:
> > >>
> >
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:de
> > >> v
> > >> @cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Nux!
> > >> <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 05.03.2014 15:52, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >> Working on it now, waiting on 1 last thing for realhostip changes
> > >>
> > >> So, does the realhostip "feature" disappear starting with 4.3?
> > >>
> > >> if that's the case we need to put this on the release notes. Happy
> > >> to do so if someone send me the text..
> > >> [Animesh] It is really a convenience that we got used to not a
> > >> feature. You can specify your own domain name and change the
> > >> certificate even now with
> > >> 4.2 and prior releases. The instructions are in Admin Guide [1]
> > >>
> > >> Amogh has put a wiki on the changes at [2].
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US//Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/ht
> > >> ml
> > >> /
> > >> Admin_Guide/console-proxy.html#change-console-proxy-ssl-certificate
> > >> -d
> > >> o
> > >> main
> > >>
> > >> [2]
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Realhost+IP+
> > >> ch
> > >> an
> > >> ges
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Lucian
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> > >>
> > >> Nux!
> > >> www.nux.ro
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> > >> o: 415.315.9385
> > >> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service
> > >> o: 415.315.9385
> > >> @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella>
> > >
> >
> > Stratosec - Compliance as a Service
> > o: 415.315.9385
> > @johnlkinsella
