-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21200/#review42572
-----------------------------------------------------------


Commit 32124df53cf9023507180c8509b6f41f29e9c4ae in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/4.4 from santhosh
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=32124df ]

Added fix for CLOUDSTACK-6548

Signed-off-by: santhosh <santhosh.eduku...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daan Hoogland <d...@onecht.net>


- ASF Subversion and Git Services


On May 8, 2014, 10:48 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21200/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2014, 10:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6548
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6548
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 1. Fixed a regression issue introduced for createPrivateNetwork
> 2. Mentioned test case 
> "integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL.test_privategw_acl", 
> post the fix
> was working fine. Below is the attached log.
> 3. Ran the checkstyle check
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 05c2725 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcManagerImpl.java ad078fc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21200/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> test_privategw_acl (integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) 
> ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 127.279s
> 
> OK
> ~                                                                             
>                                   
> ~                                                                             
>                                   
> ~                                                                             
>                                   
> ~         
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Santhosh Edukulla
> 
>

Reply via email to