Added API issues we found through IAM feature in the wiki page created by Demetrius: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+changes
Thanks -min On 5/14/14 9:34 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >Thanks Daan. Yes, I saw that there is another thread about putting an API >request for 5.0 api. Once we are done with this disabling, we will put the >issues we have found with current API in that wiki page to take into >consideration when we design the new API. > >-min > >On 5/14/14 12:12 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Min, >> >>I think everybody knows I am all for less features per release. I >>don't think you are making a bad call, per se. I do think we should >>consider if we can come up with a total picture of what 5.x would >>require af the api, though. Can you add to the discussion what it is >>that is keeping you from implementing. And what requirements you have >>for the 5.0 api so we can start devising the architectural guidelines >>for the new api. more and more calls for a 5.0 are coming up lately so >>let's move forward. (changing title) >> >>On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> In the past several weeks, QA has done some testing on IAM feature and >>>found >>> several backward-compatibility issues. Even though Prachi and I have >>>tried >>> our best to fix bugs to maintain backward compatibility, we realized >>>that in >>> order to support true IAM model documented in our FS >>> >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Identi >>>t >>>y+and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin, >>> we will have to make several API changes that will require us to >>>increment >>> CloudStack major version. >>> Therefore we think that IAM feature is not ready for ACS 4.4 release, >>>and we >>> would like to propose to disable it in 4.4 branch and re-enable it >>>later >>> when community decides to go for 5.x. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -min >> >> >> >>-- >>Daan >
