untagged means that no vlan-id is assigned. 'tagged' doesn't exist. I
am not sure how your topography looks. Giving you a clue to solve it
now would be guessing. That said, my guess is your public net needs a
vlan assigned. I am not sure if it is your public physical net
(updatePhysicalNetwork) or your guestnetwork (re-create i'm afraid)
best of luck,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daan, thanks for info. And one final question - is it possible to change
> Public vlan/range from untagged to tagged - editing "vlan" table and
> making change, does not really make changes after I restart VPC router...
> THanks
>
>
> On 29 May 2014 10:15, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Andrija, we plan to release it soon. It depends on how quickly issues
>> in it are fixed. The branch has been created, so you could test it and
>> report on it if you have an env to spare.
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Will try, thx. Not sure good question - when is 4.4 scheduled to be
>> > releases - few months, or more ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 May 2014 06:15, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Andrija,
>> >>
>> >> Same issue with public vlan tagged got fixed, CLOUDSTACK-5505.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Jayapal
>> >>
>> >> On 29-May-2014, at 9:38 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
>> >> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Adrija,
>> >> >
>> >> > From the logs, the public subnet is untagged.
>> >> > I think this issue is coming for the untagged public vlan in 4.3.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 1.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> {"com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand":{"nic":{"deviceId":1,"networkRateMbps":99999,"defaultNic":true,"uuid":"e6b734d4-3302-4113-8ec7-5c205c90959a","ip":"46.232.180.248","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"46.232.180.1","mac":"06:5e:e8:00:00:27","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Public","broadcastUri":"vlan://untagged","isolationUri":"vlan://untagged","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false,"name":"breth1-500"},
>> >> > 2.
>> >> >
>> >> > 3.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> "instanceName":"r-779-VM","vmType":"DomainRouter","wait":0}},{"com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand":{"ipAddresses":[{"accountId":2,"publicIp":"46.232.180.248","sourceNat":true,"add":true,"oneToOneNat":false,"firstIP":false,"broadcastUri":"untagged","vlanGateway":"46.232.180.1","vlanNetmask":"255.255.255.0","vifMacAddress":"06:5e:e8:00:00:27","networkRate":99999,"trafficType":"Public","networkName":"breth1-500"}],"accessDetails":
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > From the logs VR logs, the ipassoc script got the interface id as
>> null.
>> >> > May 28 12:37:33 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> ethnull to appear, 0 seconds
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Jayapal
>> >> >
>> >> > On 29-May-2014, at 1:08 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks Daan,
>> >> >
>> >> > my problem is that I'm in production for 3rd day now, and restoring DB
>> >> and
>> >> > downgrading back to 4.2.1 doesn't seem as option for me at the moment,
>> >> > since I would loose new acounts and single VMs, etc...
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Andrija
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 28 May 2014 21:34, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:
>> >> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija,
>> >> >
>> >> > nevertheless it sounds familiar. I will be back in the office on
>> >> > monday and ask around.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andrija Panic <
>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > Hi Daan,
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't think this is my issue, at least I don't make use of private
>> >> > gateway - this is just simple as: create new VPC from scratch -
>> Public
>> >> > IP
>> >> > is not assigned to VR eth1 interface inside VR...
>> >> >
>> >> > I have filed the bug:
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6801
>> >> >
>> >> > This same thing happened previously to Andrei Mikhailovsky:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201405.mbox/%3C33347835.250.1399336340785.JavaMail.andrei@tuchka%3Eand
>> >> > it is not resolved
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 28 May 2014 21:01, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija,
>> >> >
>> >> > this sound like something we seen as well.
>> >> > can you check if this is it :
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6485
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks,
>> >> > Daan
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Andrija Panic <
>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > Hi there,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm having big time problems with Public IP missing from VPC VR's
>> >> > eth1,
>> >> > after upgrade to ACS 4.3.1 - did not found this filed as bug so
>> >> > far...and
>> >> > it worked all fine on ACS 4.2.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > No help so far from user mailing list...
>> >> >
>> >> > Below is a detailed explanation, and logs from inside VR, and from
>> >> > management (all fine with management logs...)
>> >> >
>> >> > If anybody can help, I would very much appriciate this, since now I
>> >> > have
>> >> > bunch fo VPC unoperational...
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> > From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> > Date: 28 May 2014 14:50
>> >> > Subject: Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1
>> >> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > and as I said eth1 is present:
>> >> >
>> >> > root@r-794-VM:~# cat /proc/net/dev
>> >> > Inter-| Receive |
>> >> > Transmit
>> >> > face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed
>> >> > multicast|bytes
>> >> > packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
>> >> > eth3: 11484 131 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > 11590
>> >> > 131 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > lo: 214 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > 214
>> >> > 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > eth2: 32970 544 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > 2084
>> >> > 24 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > eth1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > 0
>> >> > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > eth0: 150207 1319 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> > 264232
>> >> > 1180 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 28 May 2014 14:47, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, from /var/log/messages/ inside VR:
>> >> >
>> >> > This is a major show stopper - all our VPCs are unusable complete.
>> >> > Anybody... ?
>> >> >
>> >> > May 28 12:37:33 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 0 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:34 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 1 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:35 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 2 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:36 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 3 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:37 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 4 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:38 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 5 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:39 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 6 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:40 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 7 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:41 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 8 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:42 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 9 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:43 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 10 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:44 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 11 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:45 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 12 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:46 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 13 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:47 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 14 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:48 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 15 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:49 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
>> >> > ethnull to appear, 16 seconds
>> >> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:interface ethnull
>> >> > never
>> >> > appeared
>> >> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Adding ip
>> >> > 46.232.180.246
>> >> > on
>> >> > interface ethnull
>> >> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Add routing
>> >> > 46.232.180.246
>> >> > on interface ethnull
>> >> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_privateGateway.sh:Added SourceNAT
>> >> > 46.232.180.246 on interface ethnull
>> >> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_snat.sh:Added SourceNAT
>> >> > 46.232.180.246
>> >> > on interface eth1
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 28 May 2014 12:59, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Defined eth1 manually inside /etc/network/interfaces inside VPC's
>> >> > VR.
>> >> > iface eth1 inet static
>> >> > address 46.232.180.246
>> >> > netmask 255.255.255.0
>> >> >
>> >> > ifup eth1
>> >> > ip route add default via 46.232.180.1
>> >> >
>> >> > so now VR works fine (have access to internet)
>> >> >
>> >> > But again, adding new IP to VR, and enabling static NAT is
>> >> > failing...
>> >> > That is, geting new IP works fine (just associated with account)
>> >> > But enabling static NAT fails, due to "resource unavailable"
>> >> >
>> >> > Here are management logs:
>> >> > 2014-05-28 12:57:00,716 WARN [c.c.n.r.RulesManagerImpl]
>> >> > (catalina-exec-22:ctx-537ac57b ctx-8c44c786) Failed to create static
>> >> > nat
>> >> > rule due to
>> >> > com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
>> >> > [DataCenter:1]
>> >> > is unreachable: Unable to apply static nat rules on router
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3915)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyStaticNats(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3963)
>> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> >> > Method)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
>> >> > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy240.applyStaticNats(Unknown Source)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.applyStaticNats(VirtualRouterElement.java:650)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.IpAddressManagerImpl.applyStaticNats(IpAddressManagerImpl.java:1762)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.applyStaticNatForIp(RulesManagerImpl.java:1324)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.enableStaticNat(RulesManagerImpl.java:602)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.enableStaticNat(RulesManagerImpl.java:446)
>> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> >> > Method)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(ActionEventInterceptor.java:50)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
>> >> > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy88.enableStaticNat(Unknown Source)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.nat.EnableStaticNatCmd.execute(EnableStaticNatCmd.java:129)
>> >> > at
>> >> > com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161)
>> >> > at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:531)
>> >> > at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:374)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> > com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:323)
>> >> > at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.access$000(ApiServlet.java:53)
>> >> > at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:115)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
>> >> > at
>> >> > com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:112)
>> >> > at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:74)
>> >> > at
>> >> > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
>> >> > at
>> >> > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2274)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
>> >> > at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>> >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 28 May 2014 00:58, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Jayapal,
>> >> >
>> >> > eth1 seems present (lspci and virsh comfirmed), but not started
>> >> > inside
>> >> > VPC's VR - (VR used for Shared Network is fine)...
>> >> > I could confirm by virsh that is is plugged inside appropriate
>> >> > bridge
>> >> > breth1-500 (check management logs...)
>> >> >
>> >> > management log while createing new VPC (VR) -
>> >> > http://pastebin.com/s77nu5Ei
>> >> > The public IP is there, so command is fine for creating it I
>> >> > guess...
>> >> >
>> >> > VR's /var/log/cloud.log after rebooting VR from CS GUI
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:46:58 UTC 2014 Executing cloud-early-config
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:46:58 UTC 2014 Detected that we are running inside
>> >> > kvm
>> >> > guest
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:46:59 UTC 2014 Patching cloud service
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Updating log4j-cloud.xml
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Setting up VPC virtual router system
>> >> > vm
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 checking that eth0 has IP
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Setting up apache web server for VPC
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service dnsmasq = 1
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service haproxy = 1
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Processors = 1 Enable service = 0
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service cloud = 0
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 cloud: disable rp_filter
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 disable rpfilter
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 cloud: enable_fwding = 1
>> >> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 enable_fwding = 1
>> >> >
>> >> > ifconfig (no eth1 shown)
>> >> >
>> >> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0e:00:a9:fe:03:5c
>> >> > inet addr:169.254.3.92 Bcast:169.254.255.255
>> >> > Mask:255.255.0.0
>> >> >
>> >> > eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:7d:92:00:10
>> >> > inet addr:10.0.1.1 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> >> >
>> >> > eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:78:e9:00:05
>> >> > inet addr:10.0.3.1 Bcast:10.0.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> >> >
>> >> > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> >> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > cat /etc/network/interfaces
>> >> > auto lo eth0
>> >> > iface lo inet loopback
>> >> > iface eth0 inet static
>> >> > address 169.254.3.92
>> >> > netmask 255.255.0.0
>> >> >
>> >> > lspci - shows 4 ehternet addapters
>> >> > ethtool eth1 = no link detected
>> >> > virsh - confirmed that eth1 is plugged to correct bridge
>> >> > (breth1-500)
>> >> > as
>> >> > indicated by management logs, and shows good MAC address as shown
>> >> > in
>> >> > managemetn log on pastebin..
>> >> >
>> >> > This is completely makeing VPCs unusable...
>> >> > :(
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 27 May 2014 16:36, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
>> >> > jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > Can you please share management server and router logs in
>> >> > pastebin.comto understand the issue ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Jayapal
>> >> >
>> >> > On 27-May-2014, at 6:21 PM, Andrija Panic <
>> >> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > after the upgrade to ACS 4.3 (from 4.2.1) existing VRs for VPC
>> >> > lost
>> >> > their
>> >> > eth1 which is public NIC. VR got eth0(control nic) and eth2 and
>> >> > eth3
>> >> > (bith
>> >> > belonging to Tiers). From CS GUI, it is reported that the VR has
>> >> > eth1
>> >> > with
>> >> > Public network attached, but from inside (ssh to VR) there is no
>> >> > eth1
>> >> > with
>> >> > public IP...
>> >> >
>> >> > Even after destroying those VR, they are recreated again, but
>> >> > without
>> >> > eth1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anybody experienced same situtation ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija Panić
>> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija Panić
>> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Andrija Panić
>> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> > http://admintweets.com
>> >> > --------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Andrija Panić
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > http://admintweets.com
>> > --------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
> --------------------------------------
> http://admintweets.com
> --------------------------------------
--
Daan
