-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/#review46196
-----------------------------------------------------------



test/integration/component/test_multipleremotevpn_vpc.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/#comment81491>

    We are restarting management server, if it is kept as part of component, 
then other tests when running parallely, will get affected? Do we want to add 
this as part of component or there is additional maint directory, we may want 
to put there. 



test/integration/component/test_multipleremotevpn_vpc.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/#comment81492>

    use is not None


- Santhosh Edukulla


On June 17, 2014, 9 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 17, 2014, 9 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha 
> hariharan, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, sudha ponnaganti, and 
> SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Stress Test that tests multiple VPN Connections to VPC. The number of VPN 
> Connections to be stressed with can be regulated using "vpnclient_count" on 
> test_data.py.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_multipleremotevpn_vpc.py PRE-CREATION 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py d870c98 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Test case no : Enable VPN for Public IP Address on the VPC ... === TestName: 
> test_01_Multiple_RemoteAccessVPN_Connections_To_VPC_Ping_Guest_VM_Multiple_Times
>  | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 2480.632s
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chandan Purushothama
> 
>

Reply via email to