+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote: > That's defined in the bylaws as: > > 3.2.3. Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 > binding votes and twice as many binding +1 votes as binding -1 votes. > > > On Monday, July 14, 2014, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 with a question. what does 'lazy' signify in 'lazy 2/3 majority of > > voting pmc members'? It would seem to me that it has no meaning when > > talking about a 2/3 majority of voting members. I guess I should have > > brought this up earlier, sorry. > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Since there don't appear to be any objections, I'm calling a vote for > > > the attached patch to our project bylaws. > > > > > > Please vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1 - accept the proposed patch to the project bylaws > > > [ ] +/-0 - no strong opinion > > > [ ] -1 - do not accept the proposed patch > > > > > > This vote requires a lazy majority of active PMC members, at least 3 +1 > > > (binding) and more +1 than -1. > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
