Daan, In Japan, already some of press has announced 4.4 release and already some of users tried this version so I think we should be keep expose 4.4 on site. And if issues only depend on systemvm, It should be add note about links for fixed systemvm template and explain workaround to avoid this specific issue.
Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > H, > > In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been > reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require > intimate sysadmin experience. It seems to me we didn't deliver the > quality we want to. > > One of the problems is that the systemvms need an upgrade because of > our java 1.7 usage which poses a potential bootstrap problem in case > the secondary storage vm is rebooted/restarted. A possible solution > would be to have the svm do an update on the java packages with ssh > during the upgrade of the management server. > Concequential problem is that the upgrade of the systemvms at this > moment requires manual intervention of the operator, as the upgrade > code as used in the case of 4.3 has not been created for this version. > A workaround is here: > https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c/ > > SO I wonder if we should still expose the world to version 4.4.0 > > thoughts? > -- > Daan
