Ah, an even smaller proposal then mine, good.

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the following can solve the cherry-picking problem but it needs 
> everyone’s support to work:
>
> - Once a release branch is cut out, all the committers and contributors 
> “should” only work on the release branch. It can be discussed if we want to 
> work on it directly or branch out on it and work in that branch and have RMs 
> to merge that branch on the release branch. IMO if we work directly on the 
> release branch we potentially reduce a lot of RM’s work.
>
> - Only (new) feature development and related enhancements/bugfixes can land 
> on master directly or merged from their respective branches.
>
> - The RMs or anyone would keep merging the release branch with fast forward 
> only on regular basis:
>       git checkout master
>       git merge --ff <release-branch>
>       <fix any conflicts and git commit -as etc.>
>
> This way ‘master' gets all the good stuff from release branch and the release 
> branch gets “more attention”.
>
> If we somehow can reduce the release cycle timeline/length, the divergence 
> between master and release branches can be potentially less causing less 
> conflicts/issues when following the above.
>
> Thoughts, flames?
>
> Regards.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to