> On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:46 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Looks like an additional jquery-validate library was added, can you explain 
> > what this does such as validates what in the frontend?

It adds extra validation capabilities to the jquery-validation plugin that we 
are already using. At the moment none of them is used, but once this has been 
committed I will quickly add validations for ipv4, ipv6, url fields for example.

It will be that easy:

ip_address_field: {
    required: true,
    ipv4: true //this will use the ipv4 validator defined in the 
additional-methods lib
}


- Gabor


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26053/#review55783
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 30, 2014, 5:12 p.m., Gabor Apati-Nagy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26053/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 30, 2014, 5:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7659
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7659
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch upgrades jquery-validation library and also adds the 
> additional-methods.js extension that offers additional validation options 
> (same license applies, same publisher). I also updated the LICENSE file to 
> show the added file as well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   LICENSE 497323bffce2b2afab28c187cfdafa960944ed94 
>   ui/index.jsp e0b4b7848175e3f2159d44d6ac48d122858a2854 
>   ui/lib/jquery.validate.additional-methods.js PRE-CREATION 
>   ui/lib/jquery.validate.js 72296a61f208298f2e54ac7b54b70557f41e0f84 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26053/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested that the validation is still working as expected.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabor Apati-Nagy
> 
>

Reply via email to