+1 (binding) , found some inconsistency on the ui like the "add" button for tags. but it's fixed in 4.5 branch.
Did tests the upgrade issue of cluster settngs, and vpn-client on VPC with OSX. some minor tests. hypervisor: xenserver 6.2 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Ian Duffy <i...@ianduffy.ie> wrote: > +0 > > On a basic zone deployment I seem to be having issues accessing the console > proxy. > > From what I can work out this has something to do with the iptables on the > hypervisor for security groups. > Flushing the iptables on the hypervisor running the console vm fixes the > issue but breaks all the security groups. > > Can anybody else confirm if they experience a similar issue? I did two > clean deployments happened both times. > Everything else seemed to work fine. > > On 15 October 2014 12:13, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Based on the commits that have happened my old tests are still valid. > > > > Wido > > > > On 10/14/2014 11:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > As all open blocking issues were reported fixed today, I've created a > > 4.4.1 > > > release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20141014T2316 > > > Commit: 8db506b536f3139250d33df571c98c1c3fa83650 > > > > > > List of changes: > > > > > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/ > > > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > > > location): > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.1/ > > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > may for(tun/c)e be with us, > > > > > >