Correct on both counts On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks Tim, from this I take that hypervisor versions are hardcoded still, > and xenserver 6.5 is supported since 4.5. correct? > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tim Mackey <tmac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Daan, > > > > Here are the relevant commits: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2be02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723 > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=b7f5e95c8f17cf42d35705872b4210db8c2def72 > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=674af6e47313fa18c18536a2daed90d13b9a9a59 > > > > Mike, > > > > Here's an example of the type of DB changes: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=setup/db/db/schema-441to450.sql;h=e6aae8e3d624744af9f19b132fa8f53b5a4cddb5;hp=34d5f8842005f8a2da4df8a9a838d919cc648831;hb=2be02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723;hpb=f212aa57c32eb05d6a69730e37ac50bdb1f0a268 > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, Tim, I'm a little unclear of what you mean by requiring a DB > > update. > > > > > > Can you clarify that? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Tim, these changes are needed? so 4.4.1 will not work with db > > changes... > > > Do > > > > you have a commit id? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tim Mackey <tmac...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I know that master had a bunch of cleanup work to make things work > > > better > > > > > (commits were a month ago), but baring any significant issues, > being > > > able > > > > > to support a newer XenServer should be as simple as a database > > update. > > > > So > > > > > net of this master *today* should work fine with 6.5 (and the > various > > > > > pre-release builds since beta.2). > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong but, if a previous XenServer > > resource > > > > > class > > > > > > can handle the newer version of XenServer, then I don't think you > > > need > > > > to > > > > > > make any changes to CloudStack files to use that newer version. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you do see some incompatibility with that version of > XenServer, > > > then > > > > > > someone would need to create a new resource class to handle the > > > > > > discrepancies. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 20, 2014, Adrian Lewis < > > > adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues > with > > > > using > > > > > > 6.5 > > > > > > > when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility > > > problems, > > > > > > will > > > > > > > it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told > > > that > > > > > > newer, > > > > > > > effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid > > > hypervisor? > > > > > > > Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5 > > > when > > > > it > > > > > > > comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start > using > > > it? > > > > If > > > > > > so, > > > > > > > are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it > > > require > > > > > > > rebuilding? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com > > > > <javascript:;>] > > > > > > > Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28 > > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it should be minimal, because although there are large > > > > internal > > > > > > > changes (e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage > > > > datapath, > > > > > > > PVHVM > > > > > > > mode for RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface is essentially > unchanged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Stephen Turner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;>] > > > > > > > Sent: 20 October 2014 14:32 > > > > > > > To: dev > > > > > > > Subject: xenserver 6.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anybody (know of) work on supporting xenserver 6.5 or has > an > > > > idea > > > > > of > > > > > > > how much effort that is going to be? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > > > > > > > > -- > Daan >
