I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :) > Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an indication, > or do i misunderstand?
All votes are important [1] and count as indicator, who ever vote mean something, It also show that the community members did some tests or review of some kind. And whoever doing a -1 with valid justification will be listen. It would be much more interesting to see an RC with 15 non binding votes than the 3 minimum binding. [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Den søndag 16. november 2014 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org> > følgende: > > > I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@ > > related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an > RC > > it would potentially involved more people in the test phases. > > > > > I must disagree. Creating cloudstack is indeed a dev thing, but if you look > at the last releases and the trouble they had we should look at and embrace > any way to improve testing. Using simulator and spinning up basic zones can > only reveal a minority of issues. > > Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an indication, > or do i misunderstand? > > But i do agree that providing packages are crucial, that would help us > discover packaging problems as well > > Erik >
