-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/#review61917
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Simon Fiddaman


On Nov. 18, 2014, 1:44 p.m., Ilia Shakitko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2014, 1:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala, Rohit Yadav, Simon Fiddaman, 
> Stephen Hoogendijk, and Wei Zhou.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7903
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7903
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When you want to build 95-percentile billing model for the network traffic 
> usage, it is good to have 5-minutes (or 1-minute) usage samples instead of 10 
> (which is minimum allowed in ACS at the moment). Let admin to control it.
> This change decreases the lower limit for USAGE_AGGREGATION_RANGE_MIN 
> parameter, making it minimum possible positive integer. It is also removes 
> declaration of the same constant in 3 places.
> 
> Will be happy if patch can be:
> - cherry-picked to the 4.4 and 4.5 branches
> - included to the 4.4.2 tag.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java 
> 23ddfb1 
>   server/src/com/cloud/server/StatsCollector.java 1fcaa62 
>   usage/src/com/cloud/usage/UsageManagerImpl.java fe7ee1e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested on master, 4.4 and 4.5 branches. But then during the review time I had 
> to re-prepare the patch and it become compatible only for master branch.
> 
> If you accept the patch, could you also cherry-pick my commit to 4.4 and 4.5 
> branches? (there will be 1 one-line conflict to resolve)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ilia Shakitko
> 
>

Reply via email to