We discussed this very thing awhile back, and decided the correct fix was to have the storage drivers contain a method that would decide if a pool type is capable of thin provisioning. It's a bigger fix than this though.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, ghxandsky <g...@git.apache.org> wrote: > GitHub user ghxandsky opened a pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74 > > Cloudstack doesn't consider storage overprovisioning factor when using > t... > > ...hin Provisioning over ShareMountPoint with KVM. > > You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: > > $ git pull https://github.com/ghxandsky/cloudstack 4.4 > > Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74.patch > > To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch > with (at least) the following in the commit message: > > This closes #74 > > ---- > commit e08815db152e469c6de8009b2d5058458c271d25 > Author: 郭华星 <guohuax...@96900.com.cn> > Date: 2015-02-09T06:23:06Z > > Cloudstack doesn't consider storage overprovisioning factor when using > thin Provisioning over ShareMountPoint with KVM. > > ---- > > > --- > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket > with INFRA. > ---
