This is actually a trivial issue in reality... it either needs to be added to the exclusions in the top level pom or the ignore text needs to be moved to the top level .gitignore. No real legal issue here.
+1 (binding) - tested sigs, RAT, does it build, etc... no actual functional testing though. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Chip Childers <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote: > RAT failed with: > > Unapproved licenses: > > framework/rest/.gitignore > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following >> artifacts up for a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150302T1625 >> Commit: c066f0455fa126a2b41cccefa25b56421a445d99 >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc4/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >
