+1 (Binding) setup: RHEL 6.5 Management server, xen 6.5 Hypervisor, NFS storage, Advanced zone without sg (Manual testing) Rpm creation, install worked fine Was able to succesfully launch a vm, destroy etc. Upload template worked fine LDAP new as well existing integration worked fine RabbitMQ integration and publishing of events worked fine Creation of isolated networks, acquiring Ips, egress rules, firewalls etc, all worked fine.
Thanks, ~ Rajani On 07/11/15, 10:39 PM, "sebgoa" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > >> As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET >> (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours. >> >> Anyone else actively testing? > >I was waiting for Pierre Luc to push the RC to docker hub to at least test the >simulator. >Also I wanted to run the RAT.. > >had not time yet, unlikely to happen until monday or tuesday. > >I would be keen to keep the vote open, or cancel it if there are anythings >that pop upped. > >> >> Regards, >> Remi >> >> From: Remi Bergsma >> <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> >> Date: Wednesday 4 November 2015 15:55 >> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" >> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for >> a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 >> >> Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77 >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate >> "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >
