Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1179#discussion_r46771839
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/element/VirtualRouterElement.java ---
@@ -841,24 +857,26 @@ public VirtualRouterProvider addElement(final Long
nspId, final Type providerTyp
@Override
public boolean applyPFRules(final Network network, final
List<PortForwardingRule> rules) throws ResourceUnavailableException {
+ boolean result = false;
if (canHandle(network, Service.PortForwarding)) {
final List<DomainRouterVO> routers =
_routerDao.listByNetworkAndRole(network.getId(), Role.VIRTUAL_ROUTER);
if (routers == null || routers.isEmpty()) {
s_logger.debug("Virtual router elemnt doesn't need to
apply firewall rules on the backend; virtual " + "router doesn't exist in the
network " + network.getId());
- return true;
+ result = true;
--- End diff --
I agree with your consideration and I am not forcing you to change to win
my lgtm. I just want to make sure we discuss the consideration here for
posterity and change only if a simple good alternative comes up.
I noticed line 874 and wondered about this and the &= thingy upstairs. I
would use a combination of first trying all of them and then throw the
exception if any of them failed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
