Yes that is how it been design right. PVLAN On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
> Just for clarity here, are talking QinQ?. I.e. A Vlan within a vlan? > > ________________________________________ > From: Keerthiraja SJ <sjkeer...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:44 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Anyone Can Help > > Hi All, > > I was been following up and testing past three version about the PVLAN > setup. Which was worked on 4.2. It failed on version 4.5 / 4.6 / 4.7/ 4.8. > > I raised issue in jira. > > Two of my consulting company implemented PVLAN using Cloudstack 4.2 there > is no chance for them to upgrade because this was really help there > business needs in cloudstack providing VM to there customer on same subnet. > > It will be great could someone can say that is it really working or is the > fetures been depecreated > > > Reference WiKi > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN > > Issues > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2404 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9225 > > I tested in 4.5 and 4.7 is not working. It will great that in CS community > could someone really help on this. > > Thanks, > Keerthi >