For those interested: Fred and I have some adjustments for Fedora and as Cloudstack we need to remain at java 1.7 for now while the SBP guys are ahead of us at 1.8.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Great to see more and more people use the bubbles! > > Setting up: > https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-blueprint > > Using: > https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-toolkit > > Happy testing :-) > > Regards, Remi > > > On 07 Apr 2016, at 19:56, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > > > If you want me to verify things in your env, you can send me a tmate > > <https://tmate.io/> and I can have a look. > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > Lead Developer > > > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> yes, makes perfect sense. I skipped 1326 for now, I just tried to build > >> 1436 it fails in the rpm build fase. I am now going to try that ui > thing to > >> build confidence in my test environment. > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > >> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Sure it makes. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yes, if the PR is ONLY a test and does not touch any other code then > we > >>> can > >>>> only run that test. I agree with you. > >>>> > >>>> If any code is changed outside the test, I always run the full suite. > >>> Make > >>>> sense? > >>>> > >>>> *Will STEVENS* > >>>> Lead Developer > >>>> > >>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > >>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > >>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> running a new test in an environment should pass but should not > >> require > >>>> all > >>>>> other test being re-validated. SO what is the point of running all > >>>> others? > >>>>> I am not saying we shouldn't regularly run all tests but in this case > >>> it > >>>>> adds no value AFAICT. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, I want to run tests against the tests. I have found issues in > >>>> some > >>>>> of > >>>>>> the tests not working as expected, so I add the test to the run and > >>> run > >>>>>> them. I think it is worth it because then we know the test is > >> valid > >>>>>> later. I would rather have the author fix the test now if there > >> are > >>>>>> problems than having to work through it later. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am going to be doing a big push on getting testing cleaned up, so > >>>> when > >>>>> I > >>>>>> start going through all the tests and validating them, I want to > >>> reduce > >>>>> the > >>>>>> amount of work I have to do, so validating the tests at source > >> makes > >>>>> sense. > >>>>>> :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *Will STEVENS* > >>>>>> Lead Developer > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > >>>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > >>>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Daan Hoogland < > >>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1326 is just a test. it does not touch production code. Do we run > >>>>>>> regression tests against such PRs. seems a waste to me. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Daan Hoogland < > >>>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Daan Hoogland < > >>>>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 1326 - master (*pending CI) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> starting > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Daan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Daan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Daan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Rafael Weingärtner > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Daan > >> > -- Daan
