Hi Rohit,
what are we trying to achieve by moving marvin into a separate repo.? --Bharat. ________________________________ From: Raja Pullela <raja.pull...@accelerite.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:30:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Marvin to its own repository Hi Rohit, same question as Rene has posted, impact on older releases – will have issues on older releases. I know that the older releases have marvin code which can be used. Also, this will require changes on the CI side to pull the correct repo for Marvin. +1, if Bharat can modify CI implementation to take care of this? best, Raja Senior Manager, Product Development Accelerate, www.accelerite.com,@accelerite<http://www.accelerite.com,@accelerite> 2055, Laurelwood Road, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Phone: 1-408-216-7010 On 7/18/16, 3:14 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <bhais...@apache.org> wrote: All, Based on a recent discussion thread [1], I want to start a voting thread to gather consensus around splitting Marvin from the CloudStack repository. On successful voting, we would extract and maintain Marvin as a separate library in a separate repository (example repository [2]) and various build/test systems such as Travis [3] can install it directly for usage with pip+git etc. Background: During the build process, a commands.xml generated to build apidocs is also used to generate CloudStack Cmd and Request classes are auto-generated, which is the only dependency why we needed Marvin and CloudStack together. The auto-generated cloudstackAPI module can be also generated against a live running CloudStack mgmt server which has api discovery (listApis) enabled. The integration tests will still be tied to a branch and will remain withing the repository. A PR [3] was sent to show that we can still execute tests using this approach, and this would finally allow us to build, release and use Marvin as an independent library. Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) [1] http://markmail.org/thread/kiezqhjpz44hvrau [2] https://github.com/rhtyd/marvin [3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599 Regards, Rohit Yadav DISCLAIMER ========== This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. DISCLAIMER ========== This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
