Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726#discussion_r84862649
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -2199,15 +2199,20 @@ public void cleanupDownloadUrls(){
if(downloadUrlCurrentAgeInSecs <
_downloadUrlExpirationInterval){ // URL hasnt expired yet
continue;
}
-
- s_logger.debug("Removing download url " +
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " +
volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId());
+ long volumeId = volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId();
+ s_logger.debug("Removing download url " +
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " + volumeId);
// Remove it from image store
ImageStoreEntity secStore = (ImageStoreEntity)
_dataStoreMgr.getDataStore(volumeOnImageStore.getDataStoreId(),
DataStoreRole.Image);
secStore.deleteExtractUrl(volumeOnImageStore.getInstallPath(),
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl(), Upload.Type.VOLUME);
// Now expunge it from DB since this entry was created
only for download purpose
_volumeStoreDao.expunge(volumeOnImageStore.getId());
+ Volume volume = _volumeDao.findById(volumeId);
+ if (volume.getState() == Volume.State.Expunged)
--- End diff --
@yvsubhash It is not about the DB relationship, is it possible that some
other thread went ahead and deleted the volume entry after the store_ref
entries are queried?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
