Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726#discussion_r84862649 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java --- @@ -2199,15 +2199,20 @@ public void cleanupDownloadUrls(){ if(downloadUrlCurrentAgeInSecs < _downloadUrlExpirationInterval){ // URL hasnt expired yet continue; } - - s_logger.debug("Removing download url " + volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " + volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId()); + long volumeId = volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId(); + s_logger.debug("Removing download url " + volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " + volumeId); // Remove it from image store ImageStoreEntity secStore = (ImageStoreEntity) _dataStoreMgr.getDataStore(volumeOnImageStore.getDataStoreId(), DataStoreRole.Image); secStore.deleteExtractUrl(volumeOnImageStore.getInstallPath(), volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl(), Upload.Type.VOLUME); // Now expunge it from DB since this entry was created only for download purpose _volumeStoreDao.expunge(volumeOnImageStore.getId()); + Volume volume = _volumeDao.findById(volumeId); + if (volume.getState() == Volume.State.Expunged) --- End diff -- @yvsubhash It is not about the DB relationship, is it possible that some other thread went ahead and deleted the volume entry after the store_ref entries are queried?
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---