Sorry to poop the party late but I am really opposed to commits@clo… To me this
one is only for commits on potential release branches not for all the work in
progress. I’d rather see either a separate list or people subscribing
themselves to PRs on github.
I do agree the dev@ is polluted and could do without. On the other hand
technical decisions tend to move to github and so a mirror on dev@ makes sense.
Hate me!
On 30/04/17 20:09, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> Op 28 april 2017 om 10:24 schreef Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net>:
>
>
> Hi Wido
>
> There have been messages from github in the past (you probably had a
> filter?). I already wrote I don't like it and suggested to use
> comm...@cloudstack.apache.org for automated and bot messages.
>
> But a few devs insisted they like to keep them here that filtering would
> be an option (for all others). So I created a filter (although I still
> thing my suggestion would be the cleaner solution). The filter is not
> matching anymore, I also have to adjust it.
>
> I am still +1 for moving them to commits@ and whoever needs them can
> subscribe to this list. Opt-In.
>
Yes, let me ask for that at infra. The commits list seems like the right
place for this.
I rather don't filter any messages since it might scare people away from
the dev list when they get so many messages.
Wido
> René
>
> On 04/28/2017 08:28 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13929
> >
> > We are now getting all these messages from Github on
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > We didn't have this before. Do we want this?
> >
> > Personally I find it very annoying that my inbox now gets so many
messages from Github.
> >
> > Anybody else feeling that way?
> >
> > Wido
> >
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
