Is this a format that would work for all hypervisor supported by cloudstack? Because openstack is highly focus on kvm.
Also,did anyone verified if that would work for coreos and cloudbase-init(cloud-init for Windows) Otherwise I like the idea of removing the VR dependency. Le 22 mai 2017 7:40 AM, "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro> a écrit : > +1 using openstack format > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> > > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>, "Kris Sterckx" < > kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net> > > Sent: Friday, 19 May, 2017 14:15:28 > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Config Drive: Using the OpenStack format? > > > Hi, > > > > Yesterday at ApacheCon Kris from Nuage networks gave a great > presentation about > > alternatives for userdata from the VR: Config Drive > > > > In short, a CD-ROM/ISO attached to the Instance containing the > meta/userdata > > instead of having the VR serve it. > > > > The outstanding PR [0] uses it's own format on the ISO while cloud-init > already > > has support for config drive [1]. > > > > This format uses 'openstack' in the name, but it seems to be in > cloud-init > > natively and well supported. > > > > I started the discussion yesterday during the talk and thought to take > it to the > > list. > > > > My opinion is that we should use the OpenStack format for the config > drive: > > > > - It's already in cloud-init > > - Easier to templates to be used on CloudStack > > - Easier adoption > > > > We can always write a file like "GENERATED_BY_APACHE_CLOUDSTACK" or > something on > > the ISO. > > > > We can also symlink the 'openstack' directory to a directory called > 'cloudstack' > > on the ISO. > > > > Does anybody else have a opinion on this one? > > > > Wido > > > > [0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097 > > [1]: > > http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/ > datasources/configdrive.html#version-2 >
