Hi Wei, Great, please send a PR on master.
Regards. Regards, Rohit Yadav ________________________________ From: Wei ZHOU <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 12:54:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Redundant VR Guest IPs Hi Rohit, We have some changes to use gateway IP for userdata/metadata/dhcp/dns/password server in cloudstack 4.7.1 I can port these changes to 4.11 or 4.13 if possible. -Wei Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> 于2019年6月17日周一 下午3:02写道： > Hi Richard, > > > You've probably found an implementational bug. I think the VIP should be > used for both source NAT, password, user-data and dhcp/dns services. > > > Regards, > > Rohit Yadav > > Software Architect, ShapeBlue > > https://www.shapeblue.com > > ________________________________ > From: Richard Lawley <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 6:18:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Redundant VR Guest IPs > > Hi, > > When using RVRs, the guest VMs still see the VR IP instead of the VIP > for a number of things: > * DHCP Server > * Static NAT source IP for hairpin NAT > > Just wondering what the reason is for this, as it causes a number of > issues: > * Password reset doesn't work if active VR has changed since VM boot > * Issues with DHCP renewals if VR has changed since VM boot (will discuss > later) > * Some static NAT connections confusingly (for the end user) come from > the VR IP rather than the VIP > > It seems to me that it would be better if anything referencing the VR > IP actually used the VIP, but I'm assuming someone has made a decision > not to do this at some point - just wondered what that reason is, and > whether it's still valid. > > Regards, > > Richard > > [email protected] > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > [email protected] www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
