+1 with adding documentation.

And maybe we should also refactor the port check logic and error message. 
Currently, code just tries to connect the socket for the port and if it fails 
that with the message,
Detected that another management node with the same IP XX.XX.XX.XX is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
Instead of the cockpit, it can be any other service/process. Should we try to 
get details of that service in the logs, exception message so the user can make 
changes?

Regards,
Abhishek
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: 01 July 2020 13:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Management server default port conflict

I think we can document in our CloudStack qig/release/install notes to say 
users must disable cockpit on CentOS8. Here are my 2paisas;

  *   Most users using CentOS (7/8) won't use a single-host specific management 
tool/UI such as cockpit; they would probably use some fleet management software 
or automate using ansible/puppet/ceph etc.
  *   Last time I checked the minimal CentOS-8 ISO does not install cockpit or 
that it is enabled by default (service does not run by default until you active 
the port 9090 target)
  *   Some users may have monitoring scripts/tools or security rules that 
expect port 9090 to be used by CloudStack, so it's probably safer to ask users 
to change port for cockpit than CloudStack by default

Regards.

________________________________
From: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 11:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Management server default port conflict

Hi all,

I would like to know everyone's opinion regarding an issue seen with CloudStack 
on CentOS8 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4068). CentOS8 comes with 
cockpit (https://cockpit-project.org/) installed which uses port 9090, although 
it is not active by default. CloudStack management server also needs port 9090. 
And when CloudStack management server is started with systemd it triggers the 
start of cockpit first and management server fails to start,


2020-06-25 07:20:51,707 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Detected that another management node with the same IP 10.10.2.167 is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
2020-06-25 07:20:51,708 ERROR [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] 
(main:null) (logid:) Failed to configure ClusterManagerImpl
javax.naming.ConfigurationException: Detected that another management node with 
the same IP 10.10.2.167 is already running, please check your cluster 
configuration
        at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.checkConflicts(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1192)
        at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.configure(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1065)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle$3.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:114)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.configure(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:110)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:182)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:53)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:360)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:158)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:122)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishRefresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:894)
        at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:553)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:144)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:121)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:244)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:232)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContexts(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:116)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.load(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:78)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.ModuleBasedContextFactory.loadModules(ModuleBasedContextFactory.java:37)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.init(CloudStackSpringContext.java:70)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.<init>(CloudStackSpringContext.java:57)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.<init>(CloudStackSpringContext.java:61)
        at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.web.CloudStackContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized(CloudStackContextLoaderListener.java:51)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ContextHandler.java:930)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.callContextInitialized(ServletContextHandler.java:553)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.startContext(ContextHandler.java:889)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.startContext(ServletContextHandler.java:356)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startWebapp(WebAppContext.java:1445)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.java:1409)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandler.java:822)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.doStart(ServletContextHandler.java:275)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java:524)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:72)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:110)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:97)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.gzip.GzipHandler.doStart(GzipHandler.java:425)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:72)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:117)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:97)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:72)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:407)

Therefore, in your opinion how this should be handled? Should we document that 
CS management server needs port 9090 free by default and any other process 
using it should be moved a different port or the management server port should 
be moved in case of CentOS8, either in code or documentation to change 
cluster.servlet.port in db.properties?

Regards,
Abhishek

abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.comĀ 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Reply via email to