On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Peter Royal dijo: > > On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 03:30 PM, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > >> Ok, done. The vote for the change was unambiguous. Please review my > >> commits and change the code if necessary. > > > > Done. your changes mirrored mine for the most part, and I just layered > > a few more on top (complete eviction of LogKitManager/able from the > > codebase) as well as allowing logging in CocoonServlet to be replaces > > by a subclass (so now a Log4JCocoonServlet should be pretty easy, if > > someone wants to do it). > > Thanks for the nice work. A questions: > > 1- Why we does not use log4J as the default logger? AFAIK Log4J is part of > Apache and still is alive because is better than the included log > mechanism introduced in J2SDK 1.4.x > 2- What we can win or lose if we change. I understand the answer"...once > upon a time.... there was no logger and then there was LogKit......"
You probably missed the recent thread about it. Have a look at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=106206358807904&w=2 -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
