On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that we had some minor problems with the 2.1.1 release > as stated recently in this list. That's why we didn't officially > announce the release. > AFAIK, the problems are all solved in the current cvs, so I suggest > that we make quickly a 2.1.2 release and announce officially. > > With respect to the recent thread about release management, I propse > a release date of October, 1th which would include a freeze of the > cvs starting on monday, 29th. > > If we don't want to make a 2.1.2 release yet, we have to announce > 2.1.1 and provide *somehow* a patch. I think releasing 2.1.2 is > easier. > > So please cast your vote for either: > > a) Make a 2.1.2 release on October, 1th
+1 > OR > > b) Provide a patch for 2.1.1 Do we have to place a note why there wasn't an announcement for the 2.1.1 (people might think we'e skipped a number)? -- Giacomo Pati Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
