Giacomo Pati dijo: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Then Ant can be present in the 3 options presented. I share with you >> the need to move to a better project management. In that case I think >> the question is related to Centiped vs. Maven. > > Well, all three infrastructure mentioned above are Ant, Ant based or use > Ant. I mentiond 1) because Stefano argumented that the build > infratruction at present is good enough in his eyes.
Hmm. On one side it is true. Since Ant is doing his job right now, we does not need more probes of the current build system. It is good, because it is working. On the other way, I think our job (as Cocoon developers) is to enhance and mantain the Cocoon project, we dont need to create a build system or a project management tool. For these taks there are Maven or Centipede project. I though the guys behind both projects really likes they do and know what they are doing. We can benefits from this. Note, we are not building or trying to build an Ant-like tool. The Ant guys do this work. I think it is better to save our efforts by using any of the projects related to this tasks. The idea, is to have a better project management with less effort than we currently have with Ant. Is that right? Note: I am not a Maven nor Centipede guru. But the promise behind any of both projects is good. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
