Steve K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido -- > >> What exactly led you to propose HTTPUnit but prevents you from using >> Anteater for the very same purpose (just curious)? > > I'm sorry if I gave that impression. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I > believe HTTPUnit and the anteater scripts both test in a similar way > -- they simulate an http based user-agent, sending requests to the > site, and then test the result HTML for correctness. I am looking to > do testing on the pipeline level, before the data is transformed into > HTML and sent to the user. > > I think I explained what I'm looking for a little better in my reply > to Upayavira. > > Sorry for the confusion,
No reason to be sorry. Thanks for the explanation. Guido
