Marc Portier dijo: > > > Bruno Dumon wrote: > >> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 16:33, Timothy Larson wrote: >> >>>Lets pick a name for for the element containing child widgets. >>>Off the top of my head, I remember these names being offered: >>> children, items, widgets >> >> >> Currently only "children" is in use I think, but "widgets" seems >> better to me. Which one do you prefer? >> > > +1 for widgets
+1 > >> >>>Other suggestions are welcome of course. What name do we all like? >>> This will apply to at least the AggregateField, Repeater, Union, >>> Struct, and Class widgets, and possibly to others in the future. >> >> >> And Form also. >> > > and RepeaterRow? (probably in stead of Repeater?) I prefer repeater (it is shorter, clear and I am very lazy to write Row on every Repeater ;-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
