Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Does it make sense to have same in 2.1? > We agreed, that these changes should only be in 2.2, but if someone needs it in 2.1 as well we can add it there, too.
> And more general question -- I see some commits flowing into 2.1 branch, > should those changes be also reflected in 2.2? Or, how else those > changes will get into 2.2? > We should check in all changes to 2.1 in 2.2 as well - otherwise they get lost. Carsten
