Reinhard Poetz dijo: > > From: Vadim Gritsenko > >> Reinhard Poetz wrote: >> >> >From: Antonio Gallardo >> > >> > >> > >> >>Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I've started to evaluate IDEA as well because eclipse on mach-o is >> >>>simply not usable if you don't have several GBs of RAM >> (and I don't) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>lol. We are using Eclipse and in fact I need to upgrade our 3 >> >>machines to 512, 768 and 1024 of RAM respectively. :-D >> >> >> >>It looks like eclipse has a "contract" with RAM producents. :-D >> >> >> >> >> > >> >On win2k eclipse needs about 110megs of RAM >> >(currently three different Cocoon are projects opened) and I use >> >OxygenXML as XML-Editor. >> > >> >... maybe a reason for switching back .... just kidding ;-) >> > >> > >> >> Do not hurry. WinXP, WebSphere Studio Application Developer, actual >> WebSphere container was never started, 360Mb. Searching for classes / >> method implementations / overriden methods / etc is either slow or >> inconvinient or impossible... > > We compare two different things ... the 110MB are Eclipse *only* - all > the things together will lead to the same results as you got. > Actually I wanted to say that with 512MB RAM running Win2K, Eclipse, > some containers, OpenOffice at the same time is no problem from a speed > POV.
Speed is a very relative term. For example, we had a computer with an Athlon XP 2200+ and 1GB of RAM and I will be very glad if this will be ever faster. I love the instant computing. :-D This is why I complain about having just 768MB DDR on my notebook with a Pentium IV 2.0 GHz. :-( Just for the records. In Fedora: Eclipse Version: 3.0.0 Build id: 200310101454 uses from 86MB - 150 MB (it depends how much it can eat). Then I also uses: JEdit + Mozilla + Some SSH + Konqueror Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
