On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:16:23PM -0600, Tony Collen wrote:
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
> >
> >XSP if not perfect, but we still need some kind of "official"
> >templating. What's the alternatives here?
> >
> >... and it's not that convinient to assemble DOM (or something) in flow
> >and then pass it to the templates... ;-)
>
>
> Even the JXTemplateGenerator? I think it's nice and useful. Perhaps
There is one thing that is really ugly: you do not have jx:attribute command
in jx so you have to repeat the whole tag - and what if that tag contains a
lot of other content?
ouzo
--
__
| / \ | Leszek Gawron // \\
\_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\\()//_
.'/()\'. Phone: +48(501)720812 / // \\ \
\\ // recursive: adj; see recursive | \__/ |- Re: DB support i... Jeremy Quinn
- Re: DB support in flowscr... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: DB support in fl... Leszek Gawron
- Re: DB support i... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: DB support i... Leszek Gawron
- Re: DB support i... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: DB support in flowscr... Jeremy Quinn
- Re: XSP "official" position Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: XSP "official" position Tony Collen
- Re: XSP "official" posi... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: XSP "official" posi... Leszek Gawron
- Re: XSP "official" posi... Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: XSP "official" position Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu
- Re: XSP "official" posi... Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: XSP "official" position Tony Collen
- Re: XSP "official" position Antonio Gallardo
- RE: XSP "official" posi... David Rogers
- enhance the docs (Was: XSP &q... David Crossley
- RE: XSP "official" ... Antonio Gallardo
- Re: XSP "official&qu... Steven Noels
- Re: XSP "offici... Antonio Gallardo
