My question is this behaviour intentional?
Yes, that's how it always worked.
And, IIRC, there is a patch in BugZilla to make this behavior more flexible. I have no objections if this is made somehow configurable.
Vadim
Stephan Michels wrote:
Yes, that's how it always worked.
And, IIRC, there is a patch in BugZilla to make this behavior more flexible. I have no objections if this is made somehow configurable.
Vadim
Yes, that's how it always worked.
And, IIRC, there is a patch in BugZilla to make this behavior more flexible. I have no objections if this is made somehow configurable.
Vadim
- cinclude and handle-errors Stephan Michels
- Vadim Gritsenko
