Unico Hommes wrote: > > > +1 > > I never understood why Resettable was introduced in the first place, > aren't its semantics exactly the same as Recyclable? Yepp.
> Why are Ressetable > or Recyclable not part of the core framework? I think the reason was something like this: Pooling is a container implementation specific thing and each container might do/support it different, so the interfaces don't belong to the framework but to the pooling impl :( > Even if we move to > Resettable now, nothing will insure that the next big container will not > introduce yet another interface for the same functionality. Exactly. Carsten
