-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 5 december 2003 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing web applications with mod_proxy...
Upayavira wrote:
<snip/>
If relevant, I've started extending the MountTableMatcher to include the code from the host selector. This means that you can set up virtual hosts in the matchtable.xml file, and have sitemaps mounted based upon hostname.Mmmh... is it good to mix prefix-based and host-based mounts in a single matcher?
Yes, why not? It may be better than ending up with two different mount table files.
That's precisely the point: I don't like mixing virtual hosts and URI prefixes mounts in the same mount-table.
IMO, virtualhost-based mounts are at a higher level in the processing chain than prefix-based mount, i.e. you'll very likely have one virtualhost mount table and per-host prefix mount tables.
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
