Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > On 14.12.2003 14:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2? > >>> > >>>As the tree processor is the central component that is required to > >>>run cocoon and as we currently just can't start > >>>2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see that we > >>>get a runnable 2.2 asap. > >>> > >>>What do you think about just installing the tree processor > >> > >>from 2.1? > >> > >>I was planning on working on the tree processor for 2.2 > next week and > >>during the holidays. I've been extremely busy at work for > the past few > >>weeks (am in the office right now) but this will be over after > >>tomorrow's deadline. > >> > >>I don't know how long it's going to take me to get the tree > processor > >>into a workable state. The changes that need to be made are > extensive > >>so there will be a test period after things start to work > as well. I'd > >>say, I'll probably be able to put in enough time to get it working > >>over Xmas. > > > > I'm +1 to give you the requested time frame. Have a deeper > look into > > the code and give us feedback after Xmas how long it will > take you. If > > you say it's too much time we can jump back then. I don't think we > > should do it now and if you say that it's too much work we > can install > > the 2.1 version then. But I don't think it is a good idea > to jump back > > right now. > > Same opinion here: give Unico the time and switch back in the > new year if necessary (though it would not be a good start into it). >
It's probably only a question of how long it will take to make the tree processor run with fortress. If someone is able to do that within a short time frame and thinks it's worth the effort then I think they should. Unico
