Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was wondering if some of you guys had experience with Saxon... > > Since I like its object model better than Xalan's, and I'm working on > a couple of projects requiring direct access to an XPath > implementation, I just wanted to doublecheck that I'm not going down a > awful buggy/slow road.
I am very happy with 6.5.3. Seems to be faster than xalan and more robust. I switched to saxon, when xalan failed for very complex stylesheets and never looked back. At some points its more picky about stylesheets. E,g. <template match="node = $parameter"> was accepted by xalan but correctly rejected by saxon. This may concern some logicsheets. Martin
