DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25879>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25879 directory generator caching bug ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-04 13:33 ------- Testcase : <map:match pattern="noaggregation"> <map:generate type="directory" src="d:/temp/dirtest"/> <map:serialize type="xml"/> </map:match> <map:match pattern="aggregationlevel1"> <map:aggregate element="level1"> <map:part src="cocoon:/dirtest" strip-root="true"/> <map:part src="cocoon:/dirtest" strip-root="true"/> </map:aggregate> <map:serialize type="xml"/> </map:match> <map:match pattern="aggregationlevel2"> <map:aggregate element="level2"> <map:part src="cocoon:/aggregationlevel1"/> <map:part src="cocoon:/dirtest" strip-root="true"/> </map:aggregate> <map:serialize type="xml"/> </map:match> <map:match pattern="aggregationlevel3"> <map:aggregate element="level3"> <map:part src="cocoon:/aggregationlevel2"/> <map:part src="cocoon:/dirtest" strip-root="true"/> </map:aggregate> <map:serialize type="xml"/> </map:match> Adding/removing/changing files is ok for "noaggregation" and "aggregationlevel1", the cache gets invalidated properly Nested aggregations however are not caching properly. I remember sinlge aggregations not caching properly in 2.0.4, maybe the fix did not take into account nested aggregations? I'm currently looking at validatePipeline() in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline, but it's a bit of a beast so bear with me ;)
