Geoff Howard wrote: > > Exactly. Although I didn't quite understand the bit about > adding a loglevel property for build.webapp.loglevel - it > already is a property isn't it? Yes, but with a long and not so intuitiv name. That's why I suggested the shorter form.
> And that's the benefit of > property expansion over filtering > -- you don't have to define the filter tokens and can > therefore work with arbitrary properties (even ad hoc user > defined ones). Yes, absolutely. Sorry for the confusion, I will correct this right now. Carsten
