Joerg Heinicke dijo: > On 29.03.2004 20:39, Stephan Michels wrote: > >>>Hmm, 4h for a vote was a bit short, wasn't it? So just for the records: >>>I'm with Antonio and so like JFlow vs. JSFlow. >> >> >> I know, I know, sorry about that, guys. I was very impatient. I could >> revert it if you want. > > Not because of my comment. If the vote majority will shift to another > name instead of javaflow we can still move it around. If Carsten does > not insist on his -1 including a removal I would let it at the place > where it is at the moment.
I am with Carsten too. Note he is just against the right place to put it. That is all. Think in newbies..... You will see a big neon: "JavaFlow" inside blocks and none telling you "JavascriptFlow". Also BTW, If one will be called JavaFlow, then the over must be called using the ugly large name: "Javascriptflow". This is why I prefer: JFlow and JSFlow. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
