On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 08:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28189>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28189
>
> Fix for WebDAVRepository*
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-05 06:49 -------
> The latter two make sense to me. If you find time, go ahead and commit.
I have time and I will commit :)
>
> As for setVersioned(): I don't think it is a good idea to throw an
> UnsupportedOperationException only under certain conditions.
>
> A setVersioned(uri, false) might be implemented by deleting and recreating the
> resource (making copies for safety and checking for auto-versioning).
:) I already did that, but it was not finished yesterday night.
Good to hear u have the same opinion.
--
Regards,
Rolf Kulemann
